
Tag: periodic trig identities
My Favorite One-Liners: Part 76
In this series, I’m compiling some of the quips and one-liners that I’ll use with my students to hopefully make my lessons more memorable for them.
Here’s a problem that might arise in trigonometry:
Compute
.
To begin, we observe that , so that
.
We then remember that is a periodic function with period
. This means that we can add or subtract any multiple of
to the angle, and the result of the function doesn’t change. In particular,
is a multiple of
, so that
.
Said another way, corresponds to
complete rotations, and the value of cosine doesn’t change with a complete rotation. So it’s OK to just throw away any even multiple of
when computing the sine or cosine of a very large angle. I then tell my class:
In mathematics, there’s a technical term for this idea; it’s called
throwing.
How I Impressed My Wife: Index
Some husbands try to impress their wives by lifting extremely heavy objects or other extraordinary feats of physical prowess.
That will never happen in the Quintanilla household in a million years.
But she was impressed that I broke an impasse in her research and resolved a discrepancy between Mathematica 4 and Mathematica 8 by finding the following integral by hand in less than an hour:
Yes, I married well indeed.
In this post, I collect the posts that I wrote last summer regarding various ways of computing this integral.
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 5c
Earlier in this series, I gave three different methods of showing that
Since So that I can employ the magic substitution , I’ll divide the interval of integration into two pieces and then perform the substitution
on the second piece:
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 3e
Previously in this series, I showed that
So far, I have shown that
.
where and
(and
is a certain angle that is now irrelevant at this point in the calculation).
I now write as a new sum
by again dividing the region of integration:
,
.
For , I employ the substitution
, so that
and
. Also, the interval of integration changes from
to
, so that
Next, I employ the trigonometric identity :
,
where I have changed the dummy variable from back to
.
Therefore, becomes
.
Once again, the fact that the integrand is over an interval of length allows me to shift the interval of integration.
I’ll continue this different method of evaluating this integral in tomorrow’s post.
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 3d
Previously in this series, I showed that
So far, I have shown that
,
where ,
, and
is a certain angle (that will soon become irrelevant).
I now write as a new sum
by dividing the region of integration:
,
.
For , I employ the substitution
, so that
and
. Also, the interval of integration changes from
to
, so that
Next, I employ the trigonometric identity :
,
where I have changed the dummy variable from back to
.
Therefore, becomes
.
Next, I employ the substitution , so that
and the interval of integration changes from
to
:
.
Almost by magic, the mysterious angle has completely disappeared, making the integral that much easier to compute.
I’ll continue this different method of evaluating this integral in tomorrow’s post.
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 2a
Some husbands try to impress their wives by lifting extremely heavy objects or other extraordinary feats of physical prowess.
That will never happen in the Quintanilla household in a million years.
But she was impressed that I broke an impasse in her research and resolved a discrepancy between Mathematica 4 and Mathematica 8 by finding the following integral by hand in less than an hour:
I begin by adjusting the range of integration:
,
where
,
,
.
I’ll begin with and apply the substitution
, or
. Then
, and the endpoints change from
to
. Therefore,
.
Next, we use the periodic property for both sine and cosine — and
— to rewrite
as
.
Changing the dummy variable from back to
, we have
.
Therefore, we can combined into a single integral:
Next, we work on the middle integral . We use the substitution
, or
, so that
. Then the interval of integration changes from
to
, so that
.
Next, we use the trigonometric identities
,
,
so that the last integral becomes
On the line above, I again replaced the dummy variable of integration from to
. We see that
, and so
I’ll continue with the evaluation of this integral in tomorrow’s post.