## All posts tagged **sine**

# I Have a Tan

*Posted by John Quintanilla on February 9, 2018*

https://meangreenmath.com/2018/02/09/i-have-a-tan/

# Borwein integrals

When teaching proofs, I always stress to my students that it’s not enough to do a few examples and then extrapolate, because it’s possible that the pattern might break down with a sufficiently large example. Here’s an example of this theme that I recently learned:

For further reading:

*Posted by John Quintanilla on February 5, 2018*

https://meangreenmath.com/2018/02/05/borwein-integrals/

# Trigonometry pun

*Posted by John Quintanilla on July 20, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/07/20/7722/

# Engaging students: Graphing the sine and cosine functions

In my capstone class for future secondary math teachers, I ask my students to come up with ideas for *engaging* their students with different topics in the secondary mathematics curriculum. In other words, the point of the assignment was not to devise a full-blown lesson plan on this topic. Instead, I asked my students to think about three different ways of getting their students interested in the topic in the first place.

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Jessica Bonney. Her topic, from Precalculus: graphing the sine and cosine functions.

How could you as a teacher create an activity or project that involves your topic?

A fun activity for students to learn how to graph the sine and cosine function would be having them build the graph using spaghetti and yarn. Students would start out with a simple warm-up to help them recall the different values of sine and cosine on the unit circle depending on the given angle. After the warm-up, I would then pair students off into groups of two and have them create the graphs, one creating the sine graph and the other creating the cosine graph. The first step in this activity would be for students to take their yarn and wrap it around the unit circle, marking each significant angle on the yarn with a marker. Next, students will create the x and y-axis on their paper, making the x-axis along the center of the paper (labeling it Θ) and the y-axis about 1/3 of the way from the left-end of the paper (labeling it either cosΘ or sinΘ). They then lay the yarn on the x-axis, with the end on the origin, which represents 0 radians, and using the marks they made on the yarn they will mark and label each point on the x-axis. Going back to the unit circle, students will then measure the major angles of either sine or cosine with spaghetti. This part is used to help solidify their understanding that the values of x and y correspond to cosine and sine. After measuring and cutting the spaghetti, students will then glue the spaghetti down to the matching angle on the coordinate plane. Once they have finished gluing their pasta down, students will take a marker and draw the curve. To end the lesson, I would have the students do a think-pair-share, answering the following question: Why is the function curve wider that the unit circle? After, I would have students compare their graphs and demonstrate how they found their graph.

How can this topic be used in your students’ future courses in mathematics or science?

Graphing the sine and cosine functions is a topic that students will carry on with them throughout the rest of their future science and mathematics courses. For starters, they will need to know how to do this for all advanced calculus or trigonometry classes they will take in high school or even in college. An example of this would be, when the students learn how to derive the tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant functions and graphs. Next, students will use this more in depth in their future physics courses. They will be able to relate waveforms and vibrations to that of specific sine and cosine graphs. Vibrations are graphs with the equations **y=sin(t) **or **y=cos(t)**, and the time needed for one oscillation across the x-axis is referred to as a period. Waveforms are graphs with the equations **y=sin(x) **or** y=cos(x)**, and the distance needed for one oscillation across the x-axis is referred to as a wavelength. As you can see, this particular topic in pre-calculus is an important piece in laying the foundation in their future academics and beyond.

What interesting things can you say about the people who contributed to the discovery and/or the development of this topic?

** **For starters, the word trigonometry comes from the Greek word *trignon, *meaning “triangle”, and *metron,* meaning “to measure.” Before the 16^{th} century, trigonometry was mainly used for computing the unaccounted for parts of a triangle when the other parts were given. When it comes to ancient civilizations, Egyptians had a collection of 84 algebra, arithmetic, and geometry problems called the __Rhind Papyrus__. This showed that the Egyptians had some knowledge about the triangle, almost like a “pre-trigonometry”. It wasn’t until the Greeks, that trigonometry began to make sense. Hipparchus was the first to construct a table of the values of trigonometric functions. The next key contribution to trigonometry as we know it came from India. The author of the __Aryabhatiya__ used words for “chord” and “half-chord” which was later shortend to *jya *or *jiva*. Following this, Muslim scholars translated the words into Arabic, which was then translated into Latin. An English minister, Edmund Gunter, first used the shortened term that we know, sin, in 1624. In 1614, John Napier invented logarithms, the final major contribution of classical trigonometry.

__References:__

__ __

https://www.britannica.com/topic/trigonometry

http://betterlesson.com/lesson/437440/graphs-of-sine-and-cosine

http://www.algebralab.org/lessons/lesson.aspx?file=trigonometry_trigperiodfreq.xml

*Posted by John Quintanilla on July 9, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/07/09/engaging-students-graphing-the-sine-and-cosine-functions-2/

# Engaging students: Deriving the double angle formulas for sine, cosine, and tangent

In my capstone class for future secondary math teachers, I ask my students to come up with ideas for *engaging* their students with different topics in the secondary mathematics curriculum. In other words, the point of the assignment was not to devise a full-blown lesson plan on this topic. Instead, I asked my students to think about three different ways of getting their students interested in the topic in the first place.

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Daniel Adkins. His topic, from Precalculus: deriving the double angle formulas for sine, cosine, and tangent.

*How does this topic extend what your students should have already learned?*

A major factor that simplifies deriving the double angle formulas is recalling the trigonometric identities that help students “skip steps.” This is true especially for the Sum formulas, so a brief review of these formulas in any fashion would help students possibly derive the equations on their own in some cases. Listed below are the formulas that can lead directly to the double angle formulas.

__A list of the formulas that students can benefit from recalling:__

- Sum Formulas:
- sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + cos(a)sin(b)
- cos(a+b) = cos(a)cos(b) – sin(a)sin(b)
- tan(a+b) = [tan(a) +tan(b)] / [1-tan(a)tan(b)]

- Pythagorean Identity:
- Sin
^{2}(a) + Cos^{2}(a) = 1

- Sin

This leads to the next topic, an activity for students to attempt the equation on their own.

*How could you as a teacher create an activity or project that involves your topic?*

I’m a firm believer that the more often a student can learn something of their own accord, the better off they are. Providing the skeletal structure of the proofs for the double angle formulas of sine, cosine, and tangent might be enough to help students reach the formulas themselves. The major benefit of this is that, even though these are simple proofs, they have a lot of variance on how they may be presented to students and how “hands on” the activity can be.

I have an example worksheet demonstrating this with the first two double angle formulas attached below. This is in extremely hands on format that can be given to students with the formulas needed in the top right corner and the general position where these should be inserted. If needed the instructor could take this a step further and have the different Pythagorean Identities already listed out (I.e. Cos^{2}(a) = 1 – Sin^{2}(a), Sin^{2}(a) = 1 – Cos^{2}(a)) to emphasize that different formats could be needed. This is an extreme that wouldn’t take students any time to reach the conclusions desired. Of course a lot of this information could be dropped to increase the effort needed to reach the conclusion.

A major benefit with this also is that even though they’re simple, students will still feel extremely rewarded from succeeding on this paper on their own, and thus would be more intrinsically motivated towards learning trig identities.

*How can Technology be used to effectively engage students with this topic?*

When it comes to technology in the classroom, I tend to lean more on the careful side. I know me as a person/instructor, and I know I can get carried away and make a mess of things because there was so much excitement over a new toy to play with. I also know that the technology can often detract from the actual math itself, but when it comes to trigonometry, and basically any form of geometric mathematics, it’s absolutely necessary to have a visual aid, and this is where technology excels.

The Wolfram Company has provided hundreds of widgets for this exact purpose, and below, you’ll find one attached that demonstrates that sin(2a) appears to be equal to its identity 2cos(a)sin(a). This is clearly not a rigorous proof, but it will help students visualize how these formulas interact with each other and how they may be similar. The fact that it isn’t rigorous may even convince students to try to debunk it. If you can make a student just irritated enough that they spend a few minutes trying to find a way to show you that you’re wrong, then you’ve done your job in that you’ve convinced them to try mathematics for a purpose.

After all, at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how you begin your classroom, or how you engage your students, what matters is that they are engaged, and are willing to learn.

**W**olfram does have a free cdf reader for its demonstrations on this website: http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/AVisualProofOfTheDoubleAngleFormulaForSine/

References

*Posted by John Quintanilla on July 7, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/07/07/engaging-students-deriving-the-double-angle-formulas-for-sine-cosine-and-tangent/

# My Favorite One-Liners: Part 106

In this series, I’m compiling some of the quips and one-liners that I’ll use with my students to hopefully make my lessons more memorable for them.

Years ago, when I first taught Precalculus at the college level, I was starting a section on trigonometry by reminding my students of the acronym SOHCAHTOA for keeping the trig functions straight:

,

,

.

At this point, one of my students volunteered that a previous math teacher had taught her an acrostic to keep these straight: Some Old Hippie Caught Another Hippie Tripping On Acid.

Needless to say, I’ve been passing this pearl of wisdom on to my students ever since.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on May 17, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/05/17/my-favorite-one-liners-part-106/

# My Favorite One-Liners: Part 104

In this series, I’m compiling some of the quips and one-liners that I’ll use with my students to hopefully make my lessons more memorable for them.

I use today’s quip when discussing the Taylor series expansions for sine and/or cosine:

To try to convince students that these intimidating formulas are indeed correct, I’ll ask them to pull out their calculators and compute the first three terms of the above expansion for $x=0.2$, and then compute . The results:

This generates a pretty predictable reaction, “Whoa; it actually works!” Of course, this shouldn’t be a surprise; calculators actually use the Taylor series expansion (and a few trig identity tricks) when calculating sines and cosines. So, I’ll tell my class,

It’s not like your calculator draws a right triangle, takes out a ruler to measure the lengths of the opposite side and the hypotenuse, and divides to find the sine of an angle.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on May 15, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/05/15/my-favorite-one-liners-part-104/

# My Favorite One-Liners: Part 63

I’ll use today’s one-liner to explain why mathematicians settled on a particular convention that could have been chosen differently. For example, let’s consider the definition of by first looking at the graph of .

Of course, we can’t find an inverse for this function; colloquially, the graph of fails the horizontal line test. More precisely, there exist two numbers and so that but . Indeed, there are infinitely many such pairs.

So how will we find the inverse of ? Well, we can’t. But we can do something almost as good: we can define a new function that’s going look an awful lot like . We will restrict the domain of this new function so that satisfies the horizontal line test.

For the sine function, there are plenty of good options from which to choose. Indeed, here are four legitimate options just using the two periods of the sine function shown above. The fourth option is unorthodox, but it nevertheless satisfies the horizontal line test (as long as we’re careful with .

So which of these options should we choose? Historically, mathematicians have settled for the interval .

So, I’ll ask my students, why have mathematicians chosen this interval? That I can answer with one word: tradition.

For further reading, see my series on inverse functions.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on April 4, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/04/04/my-favorite-one-liners-part-63/

# My Favorite One-Liners: Part 40

In some classes, the Greek letter or naturally appears. Sometimes, it’s an angle in a triangle or a displacement when graphing a sinusoidal function. Other times, it represents the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal distribution.

Which begs the question, how should a student pronounce this symbol?

I tell my students that this is the Greek letter “phi,” pronounced “fee”. However, other mathematicians may pronounce it as “fie,” rhyming with “high”. Continuing,

Other mathematicians pronounce it as “foe.” Others, as “fum.”

*Posted by John Quintanilla on March 12, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/03/12/my-favorite-one-liners-part-40/

# My Favorite One-Liners: Part 9

Today, I’d like to discuss a common mistake students make in trigonometry… as well as the one-liner that I use to (hopefully) help students not make this mistake in the future.

**Question**. Find all solutions (rounded to the nearest tenth of a degree) of .

**Erroneous Solution**. Plugging into a calculator, we find that .

The student correctly found the unique angle between and so that . That’s the definition of the arcsine function. However, there are plenty of other angles whose sine is equal to . This can happen in two ways.

**First**, if $\sin x > 0$, then the angle could be in either the first quadrant or the second quadrant (thanks to the mnemonic All Scholars Take Calculus). So could be (accurate to one decimal place) equal to either or else . Students can visualize this by drawing a picture, talking through each step of its construction (first black, then red, then brown, then green, then blue).

However, most students don’t really believe that there’s a second angle that works until they see the results of a calculator.

**Second**, any angle that’s coterminal with either of these two angles also works. This can be drawn into the above picture and, as before, confirmed with a calculator.

So the complete answer (again, approximate to one decimal place) should be and , where is an integer. Since integers can be negative, there’s no need to write in the solution.

Therefore, the student who simply answers has missed infinitely many solutions. The student has missed every nontrivial angle that’s coterminal with and also every angle in the second quadrant that also works.

Here’s my one-liner — which never fails to get an embarrassed laugh — that hopefully helps students remember that merely using the arcsine function is not enough for solving problems such as this one.

You’ve forgotten infinitely many solutions. So how many points should I take off?

For further reading, here’s my series on inverse functions.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on February 9, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/02/09/my-favorite-one-liners-part-9/