How I Impressed My Wife: Part 2f

Some husbands try to impress their wives by lifting extremely heavy objects or other extraordinary feats of physical prowess.

That will never happen in the Quintanilla household in a million years.

But she was impressed that I broke an impasse in her research and resolved a discrepancy between Mathematica 4 and Mathematica 8 by finding the following integral by hand in less than an hour:

Q = \displaystyle \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{dx}{\cos^2 x + 2 a \sin x \cos x + (a^2 + b^2) \sin^2 x}

In this series, I’ll explore different ways of evaluating this integral.green lineSo far in this series, I’ve shown that

Q = 2 \displaystyle \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{dx}{\cos^2 x + 2 a \sin x \cos x + (a^2 + b^2) \sin^2 x}

= 2 \displaystyle \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\sec^2 x dx}{1 + 2 a \tan x + (a^2 + b^2) \tan^2 x}

= 2 \displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{du}{1 + 2 a u + (a^2+b^2) u^2}

= \displaystyle \frac{2}{a^2+b^2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dv}{v^2 + \displaystyle \frac{b^2}{(a^2+b^2)^2} }

= \displaystyle \frac{2}{|b|} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{ dw }{w^2 +1}

This last integral can be evaluated using a standard trick. Let \theta = \tan^{-1} w, so that w = \tan \theta. We differentiate this last equation with respect to w:

\displaystyle \frac{dw}{dw} = \sec^2 \theta \cdot \displaystyle \frac{d\theta}{dw}

Employing a Pythagorean identity, we have

1 = (1+ \tan^2 \theta) \cdot \displaystyle \frac{d\theta}{dw}

Since w = \tan \theta, we may rewrite this as

1 = (1+ w^2) \cdot \displaystyle \frac{d\theta}{dw}

\displaystyle \frac{1}{1+w^2} = \displaystyle \frac{d\theta}{dw}

\displaystyle \frac{1}{1+w^2} = \displaystyle \frac{d}{dw} \tan^{-1} w

Integrating both sides with respect to w, we obtain the antiderivative

\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{1+w^2} = \tan^{-1} w + C

We now employ this antiderivative to evaluate Q:

Q = \displaystyle \frac{2}{|b|} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{ dw }{w^2 +1}

= \displaystyle \frac{2}{|b|} \displaystyle \left[ \tan^{-1} w \right]^{\infty}_{-\infty}

= \displaystyle \frac{2}{|b|} \displaystyle \left[ \displaystyle \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{-\pi}{2} \right]

= \displaystyle \frac{2\pi}{|b|}

And so, at long last, we have arrived at the solution for the integral Q. Surprisingly, the answer is independent of the parameter a.

green line

These last few posts illustrated the technique that I used to compute this integral for my wife in support of her recent paper in Physical Review A. However, I had more than a few false starts along the way… or, at the time, I thought they were false starts. It turns out that there are multiple ways of evaluating this integral, and I’ll explore another method of attack beginning with tomorrow’s post.

1 Comment
by John Quintanilla on July 25, 2015  •  Permalink
Posted in Calculus, Precalculus
Tagged ,

Posted by John Quintanilla on July 25, 2015

https://meangreenmath.com/2015/07/25/how-i-impressed-my-wife-part-2f-2/

Previous Post
Next Post
Leave a comment

1 Comment

  1. How I Impressed My Wife: Index | Mean Green Math

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

w
Cancel

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: