*Posted by John Quintanilla on March 22, 2019*

https://meangreenmath.com/2019/03/22/derivative-of-1-x/

In this series, I’m compiling some of the quips and one-liners that I’ll use with my students to hopefully make my lessons more memorable for them.

I’ll use today’s one-liner to give students my expectations about simplifying incredibly complicated answers. For example,

Find if .

Using the rules for differentiation,

With some effort, this simplifies somewhat:

Still, the answer is undeniably ugly, and students have been well-trained by their previous mathematical education to think the final answers are never that messy. So, if they want to try to simplify it further, I’ll give them this piece of wisdom:

You can lipstick on a pig, but it remains a pig.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on May 14, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/05/14/my-favorite-one-liners-part-103/

In this series, I’m compiling some of the quips and one-liners that I’ll use with my students to hopefully make my lessons more memorable for them.

I’ll use today’s one-liner when the final answer is a hideous mess. For example,

Find if .

The answer isn’t pretty:

This leads to the only possible response:

As all the King’s horses and all the King’s men said when discovering Humpty Dumpty… yuck.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on May 13, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/05/13/my-favorite-one-liners-part-102/

In this series, I’m compiling some of the quips and one-liners that I’ll use with my students to hopefully make my lessons more memorable for them.

In the first few weeks of my calculus class, after introducing the definition of a derivative,

,

I’ll use the following steps to guide my students to find the derivatives of polynomials.

- If , a constant, then .
- If and are both differentiable, then .
- If is differentiable and is a constant, then .
- If , where is a nonnegative integer, then .
- If is a polynomial, then .

After doing a few examples to help these concepts sink in, I’ll show the following two examples with about 3-4 minutes left in class.

Example 1. Let . Notice I’ve changed the variable from to , but that’s OK. Does this remind you of anything? (Students answer: the area of a circle.)What’s the derivative? Remember, is just a constant. So .

Does this remind you of anything? (

Students answer: Whoa… the circumference of a circle.)

Generally, students start waking up even though it’s near the end of class. I continue:

Example 2. Now let’s try . Does this remind you of anything? (Students answer: the volume of a sphere.)What’s the derivative? Again, is just a constant. So .

Does this remind you of anything? (

Students answer: Whoa… the surface area of a sphere.)

By now, I’ve really got my students’ attention with this unexpected connection between these formulas from high school geometry. If I’ve timed things right, I’ll say the following with about 30-60 seconds left in class:

Hmmm. That’s interesting. The derivative of the area of a circle is the circumference of the circle, and the derivative of the area of a sphere is the surface area of the sphere. I wonder why this works. Any ideas? (

Students: stunned silence.)This is what’s known as a cliff-hanger, and I’ll give you the answer at the start of class tomorrow. (

Students groan, as they really want to know the answer immediately.) Class is dismissed.

If you’d like to see the answer, see my previous post on this topic.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on April 29, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/04/29/my-favorite-one-liners-part-88/

When teaching Calculus I, I use the following mantra throughout the semester. I heard this from my calculus instructor back in 1984, and I repeat it for my own students:

There are two themes of calculus: approximating curved things by straight things, and passing to limits.

For example, to find a derivative, we approximate a curved function by a straight tangent line and then pass to a limit. Later in the semester, to find a definite integral, we approximate the area under a curve by the sum of a bunch of straight rectangles and then pass to a limit.

For further reading, I’ll refer to this series of posts on what I typically do on the first day of my calculus class.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on April 28, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/04/28/my-favorite-one-liners-part-87/

Here’s a problem from calculus:

Let . Find .

We begin by finding the first derivative using the Product Rule:

.

Next, we apply the Product Rule again to find the second derivative:

.

At this point, before simplifying to get the final answer, I’ll ask my students why the term appears twice. After a moment, somebody will usually volunteer the answer: the first term came from differentiating first and then second, while the other term came from differentiating first and then second. Either way, we end up with the same term.

I then tell my class that there’s a technical term for this: Oops, I did it again.

While on the topic, I can’t resist also sharing this (a few years ago, this was shown on the JumboTron of Dallas Mavericks games during timeouts):

*Posted by John Quintanilla on April 24, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/04/24/my-favorite-one-liners-part-83/

In differential equations, we teach our students that to solve a homogeneous differential equation with constant coefficients, such as

,

the first step is to construct the characteristic equation

by essentially replacing with , with , and so on. Standard techniques from Algebra II/Precalculus, like the rational root test and synthetic division, are then used to find the roots of this polynomial; in this case, the roots are and . Therefore, switching back to the realm of differential equations, the general solution of the differential equation is

.

As , this general solution blows up (unless, by some miracle, ). The last two terms decay to 0, but the first term dominates.

The moral of the story is: if any of the roots have a positive real part, then the solution will blow up to or . On the other hand, if all of the roots have a negative real part, then the solution will decay to 0 as .

This sets up the following awful math pun, which I first saw in the book *Absolute Zero Gravity*:

An Aeroflot plan en route to Warsaw ran into heavy turbulence and was in danger of crashing. In desparation, the pilot got on the intercom and asked, “Would everyone with a Polish passport please move to the left side of the aircraft.” The passengers changed seats, and the turbulence ended. Why? The pilot achieved stability by putting all the Poles in the left half-plane.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on April 23, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/04/23/my-favorite-one-liners-part-82/

Today’s entry is courtesy of Season 1 of The Simpsons. I’ll tell this joke just after introducing derivatives to my calculus students. Here is some dialogue from the episode “Bart The Genius”:

Teacher: So y = r cubed over 3. And if you determine the rate of change in this curve correctly, I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised.

[The class laughs except for Bart who appears confused.]

Teacher: Don’t you get it, Bart? Derivative dy = 3 r squared dr over 3, or r squared dr, or r dr r. Har-de-har-har! Get it?

For a more detailed listing of mathematical references, I highly recommend http://www.simpsonsmath.com (or http://mathsci2.appstate.edu/~sjg/simpsonsmath/), maintained by Dr. Sarah J. Greenwald of Appalachian State University and Dr. Andrew Nestler of Santa Monica College.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on April 14, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/04/14/my-favorite-one-liners-part-73/

At many layers of the mathematics curriculum, students learn about that various functions can essentially commute with each other. In other words, the order in which the operations is performed doesn’t affect the final answer. Here’s a partial list off the top of my head:

- Arithmetic/Algebra: . This of course is commonly called the distributive property (and not the commutative property), but the essential idea is that the same answer is obtained whether the multiplications are performed first or if the addition is performed first.
- Algebra: If , then .
- Algebra: If and is any real number, then .
- Precalculus: .
- Precalculus: .
- Calculus: If is continuous at an interior point , then .
- Calculus: If and are differentiable, then .
- Calculus: If is differentiable and is a constant, then .
- Calculus: If and are integrable, then .
- Calculus: If is integrable and is a constant, then .
- Calculus: If is integrable, .
- Calculus: For most differentiable function that arise in practice, .
- Probability: If and are random variables, then .
- Probability: If is a random variable and is a constant, then .
- Probability: If and are independent random variables, then .
- Probability: If and are independent random variables, then .
- Set theory: If , , and are sets, then .
- Set theory: If , , and are sets, then .

However, there are plenty of instances when two functions do not commute. Most of these, of course, are common mistakes that students make when they first encounter these concepts. Here’s a partial list off the top of my head. (For all of these, the inequality sign means that the two sides do not have to be equal… though there may be special cases when equality happens to happen.)

- Algebra: if . Important special cases are , , and .
- Algebra/Precalculus: . I call this the third classic blunder.
- Precalculus: .
- Precalculus: , , etc.
- Precalculus: .
- Calculus: .
- Calculus
- Calculus: .
- Probability: If and are dependent random variables, then .
- Probability: If and are dependent random variables, then .

All this to say, it’s a big deal when two functions commute, because this doesn’t happen all the time.

I wish I could remember the speaker’s name, but I heard the following one-liner at a state mathematics conference many years ago, and I’ve used it to great effect in my classes ever since. Whenever I present a property where two functions commute, I’ll say, “In other words, the order of operations does not matter. This is a big deal, because, in real life, the order of operations usually is important. For example, this morning, you probably got dressed and then went outside. The order was important.”

*Posted by John Quintanilla on February 8, 2017*

https://meangreenmath.com/2017/02/08/my-favorite-one-liners-part-8/

I’m doing something that I should have done a long time ago: collecting a series of posts into one single post. The following links comprised my series on a natural function that nevertheless has discontinuities.

Part 1: Introduction

Part 2: Derivation of this piecewise function, beginning.

Part 3: Derivation of the piecewise function, ending.

*Posted by John Quintanilla on November 11, 2016*

https://meangreenmath.com/2016/11/11/a-natural-function-with-discontinuities-index/