Here’s an explanation for why is undefined that should be within the grasp of pre-algebra students:

**Part 1**.

- What is ? Of course, it’s .
- What is ? Again, .
- What is ? Again, .
- What is , or ? Again, .
- What is , or ? In other words, what number, when cubed, is ? Again, .
- What is , or ? In other words, what number, when raised to the 10th power, is . Again, .

So as the *exponent* gets closer to , the answer remains . So, from this perspective, it looks like ought to be equal to .

**Part 2**.

- What is . Of course, it’s .
- What is . Again, .
- What is . Again, .
- What is ? Again,
- What is . Again,
- What is ? Again,

So as the *base* gets closer to , the answer remains . So, from this perspective, it looks like ought to be equal to .

In conclusion: looking at it one way, should be defined to be . From another perspective, should be defined to be .

Of course, we can’t define a number to be two different things! So we’ll just say that is undefined — just like dividing by is undefined — rather than pretend that switches between two different values.

Here’s a more technical explanation about why is an indeterminate form, using calculus.

**Part 1**. As before,

.

The first equality is true because, inside of the limit, is permitted to get close to but cannot actually equal , and there’s no ambiguity about if . (Naturally, is undefined if .)

The second equality is true because the limit of a constant is the constant.

**Part 2**. As before,

.

Once again, the first equality is true because, inside of the limit, is permitted to get close to but cannot actually equal , and there’s no ambiguity about if .

As before, the answers from Parts 1 and 2 are different. But wait, there’s more…

**Part 3**. Here’s another way that can be considered, just to give us a headache. Let’s evaluate

Clearly, the base tends to as . Also, as , so that as . In other words, this limit has the indeterminate form .

To evaluate this limit, let’s take a logarithm under the limit:

Therefore, without the extra logarithm,

**Part 4**. It gets even better. Let be any positive real number. By the same logic as above,

So, for any , we can find a function of the indeterminate form so that .

In other words, we could justify defining to be *any *nonnegative number. Clearly, it’s better instead to simply say that is undefined.

P.S. I don’t know if it’s possible to have an indeterminate form of where the answer is either negative or infinite. I tend to doubt it, but I’m not sure.