Here’s an explanation for why is undefined that should be within the grasp of pre-algebra students:
Part 1.
- What is
? Of course, it’s
.
- What is
? Again,
.
- What is
? Again,
.
- What is
, or
? Again,
.
- What is
, or
? In other words, what number, when cubed, is
? Again,
.
- What is
, or
? In other words, what number, when raised to the 10th power, is
. Again,
.
So as the exponent gets closer to , the answer remains
. So, from this perspective, it looks like
ought to be equal to
.
Part 2.
- What is
. Of course, it’s
.
- What is
. Again,
.
- What is
. Again,
.
- What is
? Again,
- What is
. Again,
- What is
? Again,
So as the base gets closer to , the answer remains
. So, from this perspective, it looks like
ought to be equal to
.
In conclusion: looking at it one way, should be defined to be
. From another perspective,
should be defined to be
.
Of course, we can’t define a number to be two different things! So we’ll just say that is undefined — just like dividing by
is undefined — rather than pretend that
switches between two different values.
Here’s a more technical explanation about why is an indeterminate form, using calculus.
Part 1. As before,
.
The first equality is true because, inside of the limit, is permitted to get close to
but cannot actually equal
, and there’s no ambiguity about
if
. (Naturally,
is undefined if
.)
The second equality is true because the limit of a constant is the constant.
Part 2. As before,
.
Once again, the first equality is true because, inside of the limit, is permitted to get close to
but cannot actually equal
, and there’s no ambiguity about
if
.
As before, the answers from Parts 1 and 2 are different. But wait, there’s more…
Part 3. Here’s another way that can be considered, just to give us a headache. Let’s evaluate
Clearly, the base tends to as
. Also,
as
, so that
as
. In other words, this limit has the indeterminate form
.
To evaluate this limit, let’s take a logarithm under the limit:
Therefore, without the extra logarithm,
Part 4. It gets even better. Let be any positive real number. By the same logic as above,
So, for any , we can find a function
of the indeterminate form
so that
.
In other words, we could justify defining to be any nonnegative number. Clearly, it’s better instead to simply say that
is undefined.
P.S. I don’t know if it’s possible to have an indeterminate form of where the answer is either negative or infinite. I tend to doubt it, but I’m not sure.