In this series, I’m discussing how ideas from calculus and precalculus (with a touch of differential equations) can predict the precession in Mercury’s orbit and thus confirm Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The origins of this series came from a class project that I assigned to my Differential Equations students maybe 20 years ago.
This is going to be a very long series, so I’d like to provide a tree-top view of how the argument will unfold.
We begin by using three principles from Newtonian physics — the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum, Newton’s Second Law, and Newton’s Law of Gravitation — to show that the orbit of a planet, under Newtonian physics, satisfies the initial-value problem
,
,
.
In these equations:
- The orbit of the planet is in polar coordinates , where the Sun is placed at the origin.
- The planet’s perihelion — closest distance from the Sun — is a distance of at angle .
- The function is equal to .
- is the gravitational constant of the universe.
- is the mass of the Sun.
- is the mass of the planet.
- is the angular momentum of the planet.
The solution of this differential equation is
,
so that
.
In polar coordinates, this is the graph of an ellipse. Substituting , we see that
.
In the solution for , we have and . The number is the eccentricity of the ellipse, while is proportional to the size of the ellipse.
Under general relativity, the governing initial-value problem changes to
,
,
,
where is the speed of light. We will see that the solution of this new differential equation can be well approximated by
.
This last equation describes a spiral that precesses by approximately
radians per orbit
or
radians per orbit,
where is the length of the semimajor axis of the orbit.
This matches the amount of precession in Mercury’s orbit that is not explained by Newtonian physics, thus confirming Einstein’s theory of general relativity.
To the extent possible, I will take the perspective of a good student who has taken Precalculus and Calculus I. However, I will have to break this perspective a couple of times when I discuss principles from physics and derive the solutions of the above differential equations.
Here we go…