Thoughts on Numerical Integration (Part 2): The bell curve

Numerical integration is a standard topic in first-semester calculus. From time to time, I have received questions from students on various aspects of this topic, including:

  • Why is numerical integration necessary in the first place?
  • Where do these formulas come from (especially Simpson’s Rule)?
  • How can I do all of these formulas quickly?
  • Is there a reason why the Midpoint Rule is better than the Trapezoid Rule?
  • Is there a reason why both the Midpoint Rule and the Trapezoid Rule converge quadratically?
  • Is there a reason why Simpson’s Rule converges like the fourth power of the number of subintervals?

In this series, I hope to answer these questions. While these are standard questions in a introductory college course in numerical analysis, and full and rigorous proofs can be found on Wikipedia and Mathworld, I will approach these questions from the point of view of a bright student who is currently enrolled in calculus and hasn’t yet taken real analysis or numerical analysis.

In this post, I’d like to take a closer look at the indefinite integral \displaystyle \int e^{-x^2} dx, which is closely related to the area under the bell curve \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx. This integral cannot be computed using elementary functions. However, using integration by parts, there are some related integrals that can be computed:

\displaystyle \int x e^{-x^2} dx = -\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} e^{-x^2}

\displaystyle \int x^3 e^{-x^2} dx = -\displaystyle \frac{x^2+1}{2} e^{-x^2}

\displaystyle \int x^5 e^{-x^2} dx = -\displaystyle \frac{x^4+2x^2+2}{2} e^{-x^2}

\displaystyle \int x^7 e^{-x^2} dx = -\displaystyle \frac{x^6+3x^4+6x^2+6}{2} e^{-x^2}

Based on these examples, it stands to reason that, if \displaystyle \int e^{-x^2} dx can be written in terms of elementary functions, it should have the form

\displaystyle \int e^{-x^2} dx = f(x) e^{-x^2},

where f(x) is some polynomial to be determined. We will now show that this is impossible.

Suppose f(x) = \displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n a_k x^k, a polynomial of degree n to be determined. Then we have

\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} \left[ f(x) e^{-x^2} \right] = e^{-x^2}


f'(x) e^{-x^2} - 2 x f(x) e^{-x^2} =e^{-x^2}


f'(x) - 2x f(x) = 1.

In other words, all terms on the left-hand side except the constant term must cancel. However, this is impossible: 2x f(x) is a polynomial of degree n+1 while f'(x) is a polynomial of degree n-1. Therefore, the left hand side must have degree n+1 and therefore cannot be a constant.

A similar argument shows that f(x) cannot have the form f(x) = \displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^n a_k x^{b_k}, where the exponents b_k may or may not be integers.

This may be enough to convince a calculus student that there is no elementary antiderivative of \displaystyle e^{-x^2} dx. Indeed, although the proof goes well beyond first-year calculus, there is a theorem that says that if \displaystyle \int x^a e^{bx^2} can be expressed in terms of elementary functions, then the antiderivative must have the form f(x) e^{b x^2}. So the guess above actually can be rigorously justified. References:

  • Elena Anne Marchisotto and Gholam-Ali Zakeri, “An Invitation to Integration in Finite Terms,” The College Mathematics Journal , Sep., 1994, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Sep., 1994), pp. 295-308
  • J. F. Ritt, Integration in Finite Terms: Liouville’s Theory of Elementary Methods, Columbia University Press, New York, 1948

2 thoughts on “Thoughts on Numerical Integration (Part 2): The bell curve

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.