Another poorly written word problem (Part 8)

Textbooks have included the occasional awful problem ever since Pebbles Flintstone and Bamm-Bamm Rubble chiseled their homework on slate tablets while attending Bedrock Elementary. But even with the understanding that there have been children have been doing awful homework problems since the dawn of time (and long before the advent of the Common Core), this one is a doozy.

There’s no sense having a debate about standards for elementary mathematics if textbook publishers can’t construct sentences that can be understood by students (or their parents).

 

badproblem3

On its face, problems 11 and 12 don’t look so bad. For #11, the appropriate inequality is

1400 + 243 + w \le 2000

1643 + w \le 2000

w \le 357

For #12, the inequality is

7 + g \le 15

g \le 8.

These indeed are the answers that the textbook is expecting. However, both answers are wrong because both w and g have to be positive. So the answers should be 0 \le w \le 357 and 0 \le g \le 8. Which would be no big deal — except that these problems appeared before compound inequalities were introduced. (Notice that problems 7 through 10 only contain a single inequality.)

So, in a nutshell, the correct answers for these problems require skills that students have not yet learned at the time that they would attempt these problems.

Leave a comment

2 Comments

  1. I would be more concerned about the use of a context and problem that can be solved by simple arithmetic. This is a classic case of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

    Reply
  1. Another Poorly Written Word Problem: Index | Mean Green Math

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: