In the previous posts of this series, I described two methods of deriving the formula

The first method concerned reversing the terms of the sum (or, almost equivalently, taking the terms in pairs). The second method used mathematical induction.

Mathematical induction can be applied to arithmetic series as well as other series. However, the catch is that you have to know the answer before proving that the answer actually is correct. By contrast, the first method did not require us to know the answer in advance — it just fell out of the calculation — but it cannot be applied to series that are not arithmetic.

Here’s a third method using the principle of telescoping series. This method has the strengths of the previous two methods: it does not require us to know the answer in advance, and it can also be applied to some other series which are not arithmetic.

To begin, consider the sum

At this early point, students often object, “Where did that come from?” I’ve said it before but I’ll say it again: I tell them my usual tongue-in-cheek story that this idea comes from the patented Bag of Tricks. Socrates gave the Bag of Tricks to Plato, Plato gave it to Aristotle, it passed down the generations, my teacher taught the Bag of Tricks to me, and I teach it to my students.

In any event, I will evaluate this sum in two different ways.

Step 1. Just write out the terms of the series, starting from and ending with .

Notice that, on the right-hand side, the terms cancel, the terms cancel, and so on. In fact, almost everything cancels. The only two terms that aren’t cancelled are the and terms. Therefore,

Step 2. Next, we’ll rewrite the original sum by expanding out the terms inside of the sum:

Step 3. Of course, these different looking answers from Steps 1 and 2 have to be the same, so let’s set them equal to each other:

There is one unknown in this equation, . The second sum is just the constant added to itself times, and so . Therefore, we solve for the unknown:

The beauty of this approach is that this approach can be continued. For example, to obtain , we begin with

I'm a Professor of Mathematics and a University Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of North Texas. For eight years, I was co-director of Teach North Texas, UNT's program for preparing secondary teachers of mathematics and science.
View all posts by John Quintanilla

Published

2 thoughts on “Formula for an arithmetic series (Part 6)”

## 2 thoughts on “Formula for an arithmetic series (Part 6)”