One of my guilty pleasures in the 1990s, when I was far too old to be watching children’s cartoons, was the fantastic show “Pinky and the Brain.” In the clip below, the Brain tells a scary campfire story. (Well, it’s about math, and what’s scarier than math?)
Tag: sine
The antiderivative of 1/(x^4+1): Part 2
This antiderivative has arguable the highest ratio of “really hard to compute” to “really easy to write”:
To compute this integral, I will use the technique of partial fractions. This requires factoring the denominator over the real numbers, which can be accomplished by finding the roots of the denominator. In other words, I need to solve
,
or
.
I switched to the letter since the roots will be complex. The four roots of this quartic equation can be found with De Moivre’s Theorem by writing
,
where is a real number, and
By De Moivre’s Theorem, I obtain
.
Matching terms, I obtain the two equations
and
or
and
or
and
.
This yields the four solutions
Therefore, the denominator can be written as the following product of linear factors over the complex plane:
or
or
or
or
.
We have thus factored the denominator over the real numbers:
,
and the technique of partial fractions can be applied.
I’ll continue the calculation of this integral with tomorrow’s post.
Different ways of solving a contest problem (Part 3)
The following problem appeared on the American High School Mathematics Examination (now called the AMC 12) in 1988:
If
, what is
?
When I presented this problem to a group of students, I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of creativity shown when solving this problem.
Yesterday, I presented a solution using a Pythagorean identity, but I was unable to be certain if the final answer was a positive or negative without drawing a picture. Here’s a third solution that also use a Pythagorean trig identity but avoids this difficulty. Again, I begin by squaring both sides.
Yesterday, I used the Pythagorean identity again to find . Today, I’ll instead plug back into the original equation
:
Unlike the example yesterday, the signs of and
must agree. That is, if
, then
must also be positive. On the other hand, if
, then
must also be negative.
If they’re both positive, then
,
and if they’re both negative, then
.
Either way, the answer must be .
This is definitely superior to the solution provided in yesterday’s post, as there’s absolutely no doubt that the product must be positive.
Different ways of solving a contest problem (Part 2)
The following problem appeared on the American High School Mathematics Examination (now called the AMC 12) in 1988:
If
, what is
?
When I presented this problem to a group of students, I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of creativity shown when solving this problem.
Yesterday, I presented a solution using triangles. Here’s a second solution that I received: begin by squaring both sides and using a Pythagorean trig identity.
We use the Pythagorean identity again to find :
Therefore, we know that
,
so the answer is either or
. However, this was a multiple-choice contest problem and
was not listed as a possible answer, and so the answer must be
.
For a contest problem, the above logic makes perfect sense. However, the last step definitely plays to the fact that this was a multiple-choice problem, and the concluding step would not have been possible had been given as an option.
Different ways of solving a contest problem (Part 1)
The following problem appeared on the American High School Mathematics Examination (now called the AMC 12) in 1988:
If
, what is
?
When I presented this problem to a group of students, I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of creativity shown when solving this problem.
Here’s the first solution that I received: draw the appropriate triangles for the angle :
Therefore, the angle must lie in either the first or third quadrant, as shown. (Of course,
could be coterminal with either displayed angle, but that wouldn’t affect the values of
or
.)
In Quadrant I, and
. Therefore,
.
In Quadrant III, and
. Therefore,
.
Either way, we can be certain that .
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 5h
Earlier in this series, I gave three different methods of showing that
Since The four roots of the denominator satisfy
So far, I’ve handled the cases and
. In today’s post, I’ll start considering the case
.
Factoring the denominator is a bit more complicated if . Using the quadratic equation, we obtain
However, unlike the cases , the right-hand side is now a complex number. So, To solve for
, I’ll use DeMoivre’s Theorem and some surprisingly convenient trig identities. Notice that
.
Therefore, the four complex roots of the denominator satisfy , or
. This means that all four roots can be written in trigonometric form so that
,
where is some angle. (I chose the angle to be
instead of
for reasons that will become clear shortly.)
I’ll begin with solving
.
Matching the real and imaginary parts, we see that
,
This completely matches the form of the double-angle trig identities
,
,
and so the problem reduces to solving
,
where $\sin \phi = |b|$ and $\cos \phi = \sqrt{1-b^2}$. By De Moivre’s Theorem, I can conclude that the two solutions of this equation are
,
or
.
I could re-run this argument to solve and get the other two complex roots. However, by the Conjugate Root Theorem, I know that the four complex roots of the denominator
must come in conjugate pairs. Therefore, the four complex roots are
.
Therefore, I can factor the denominator as follows:
To double-check my work, I can directly multiply this product:
.
So, at last, I can rewrite the integral as
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 4b
Previously in this series, I have used two different techniques to show that
,
where and
(and
is a certain angle that is now irrelevant at this point in the calculation).
Earlier in this series, I used the magic substitution to evaluate this last integral. Now, I’ll instead use contour integration; see Wikipedia for more details. I will use Euler’s formula as a substitution (see here and here for more details):
,
so that the integral is transformed to a contour integral in the complex plane. Under this substitution, as discussed in yesterday’s post,
and
Employing this substitution, the region of integration changes from to a the unit circle
, a closed counterclockwise contour in the complex plane:
While this looks integral in the complex plane looks a lot more complicated than a regular integral, it’s actually a lot easier to compute using residues. I’ll discuss the computation of this contour integral in tomorrow’s post.
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 3c
Previously in this series, I showed that
So far, I have shown that
.
To simplify the denominator even further, I will combine the two trigonometric terms in the denominator; this is possible because the argument of both the sine and cosine functions are the same. To this end, notice that
,
where
Next, let be the unique angle so that
,
.
With this substitution, we find that
Therefore, the integral may be rewritten as
,
where and
.
I’ll continue this different method of evaluating this integral in tomorrow’s post.
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 3b
Previously in this series, I showed that
We now employ the substitution , so that
. Also, the limits of integration change from
to
, so that
Next, I’ll divide write by dividing the interval of integration (not to be confused with the
and
used in the previous method), where
For , I employ the substitution
, so that
and
. Under this substitution, the interval of integration changes from $2\pi \le \theta \le 4\pi$ to $0 \le u \le 2\pi$, and so
Next, I use the periodic property for both sine and cosine — and
— to rewrite
as
Except for the dummy variable , instead of
, we see that
is identical to
. Therefore,
.
I’ll continue this different method of evaluating this integral in tomorrow’s post.
How I Impressed My Wife: Part 3a
Previously in this series, I showed that
,
,
.
Using these identities, we obtain
In this way, the exponents have been removed from the denominator, thus making the integrand somewhat less complicated.
I’ll continue this different method of evaluating this integral in tomorrow’s post.
