In this series, I’m discussing how ideas from calculus and precalculus (with a touch of differential equations) can predict the precession in Mercury’s orbit and thus confirm Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The origins of this series came from a class project that I assigned to my Differential Equations students maybe 20 years ago.
In a previous post, we showed that the polar equation
is equivalent to the rectangular equation
as long as . Furthermore, if
, then this represents an ellipse with eccentricity
whose major axis lies on the
axis, with one focus located at the origin.
While not directly related to our discussion of precession, it turns out that this equation represents a hyperbola if . Under this assumption,
and
, so let me rewrite the previous equation in terms of
:
This matches the form of a left-right hyperbola
,
where the center of the hyperbola is located at
Also, for a hyperbola, the distance from the center to the foci satisfies
,
so that
The two foci are located a distance to the left of the right of the center. Since it happened to happen that
, this means that the origin is, once again, one of the foci of the hyperbola.
Furthermore, the eccentricity of the hyperbola is easily computed as
,
so that, once again, the well-chosen parameter is the eccentricity.
One thought on “Confirming Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity With Calculus, Part 2d: Hyperbolas and Polar Coordinates”