My colleague Jason Ermer at Collaborative Mathematics has just published Challenge 08 on his website:
Month: February 2014
A Political Redistricting Tool for the Rest of Us
I recently read an article that gives a taste of some of the mathematics and data analysis that (in part) determines how legislative districts are drawn to (hypothetically) prevent gerrymandering. I recommend it highly.
http://www.maa.org/publications/periodicals/a-political-redistricting-tool-for-the-rest-of-us
Trivia question for the day
An analysis of subtraction algorithms from the 18th and 19th centuries
Today I happily link to this wonderful article about how elementary school students “should” subtract two numbers, as it challenges the commonly held notion that there is only one way that subtraction should be implemented.
The common algorithm taught in schools today is the Decomposition Algorithm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3itmfsP6HoM
But there’s also the Equal Additions Algorithm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN8XN_MSucI
And the Complement Algorithm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krNVuaIwi-o
And the Austrian Algorithm.
The author concludes:
The teaching and learning of subtraction is just as important today as it was in the past. Innovations in technology and mathematics curriculum have certainly occurred since the 1700s and 1800s, but the need for the teaching and learning of subtraction has not changed. Today, in many classrooms, subtraction is often taught through student-invented algorithms. Looking to the past may give teachers insight into invented algorithms or other algorithms students may use. Additionally, many teachers who do not encourage students to invent strategies teach only the “standard subtraction algorithm” presented in nearly every textbook across the United States, the decomposition algorithm. This research and analysis provides the modern teacher with an opportunity to reflect on the algorithms being taught in his or her classroom and allows the teacher to begin to think about why decomposition became the dominant algorithm in the United States. Teachers can ask their students to reflect on whether they agree with this historical turn of events. Incorporating the history of subtraction algorithms into modern elementary school mathematics invites robust mathematical discussion of subtraction and also of how, for many mathematical operations, there isn’t just one algorithm, but rather many algorithms from which to choose.
Exploring the history of subtraction in past school mathematics may provide us with insight into students’ mathematical struggles as they attempt to conceptualize not only subtraction, but also negative numbers and other notoriously challenging mathematical concepts. As educators and researchers, we need to devote more attention to issues in mathematics education such as the development of specific algorithms in elementary mathematics.
Engaging students: Pascal’s triangle
In my capstone class for future secondary math teachers, I ask my students to come up with ideas for engaging their students with different topics in the secondary mathematics curriculum. In other words, the point of the assignment was not to devise a full-blown lesson plan on this topic. Instead, I asked my students to think about three different ways of getting their students interested in the topic in the first place.
I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).
This student submission comes from my former student Roderick Motes. His topic, from Precalculus: Pascal’s triangle.
History – What are the contributions of various cultures to this topic?
Through doing this project I learned that the history of Pascal’s triangle is actually pretty fascinating, and could be an excellent talking point for students.
Pascal’s Triangle was named after Blaise Pascal, who published the right angled version of the triangle, the binomial theorem, and the proof that n choose k corresponds to the kth element of the nth row of the triangle. But this wasn’t the first time interesting results about the triangle had been published, not even in the west.
The triangle was actually independently developed and worked on as early as the 11’th century in both China and modern day Iran. In China two mathematicians, Chia Hsien and Yang Hui, worked on the triangle and it’s applications to solving polynomials. Hsien used the triangle to aid in solving for cubic roots. Hui built upon the work of Hsien and actually gave us the first visual model of the triangle and used the triangle to aid in solving higher degree roots.
Independently Omar Khayyam in Persia (modern Iran) used the triangle and binomial theorem (which was known to Arabic mathematicians at the time) to solve nth roots of polynomials.
In addition the triangle was used before Pascal to solve cubic equations, and in Europe in particular we get to the old controversy of Cardano and Del Ferro of ‘who found the general formula for cubic roots’ because another Italian man by the name of Niccolo Tartaglia claimed to have used the triangle to solve cubics and dervice the formula before Cardano published his formula.
So there were a variety of cultures who all independently recognized the significance of the triangle and used it well before Pascal. Consequently the triangle is called many things in many cultures. In China it is referred to as Yang Hui’s triangle, in Iran it is still called the Khayyam-Pascal triangle. All this goes to show that the history we think we know of mathematics may not be quite so true, and that mathematical understanding is the product of many cultures over many years.
Technology- How can you effectively use technology to engage students on this subject?
There are a variety of technological resources you could use to craft a lesson. In particular I’m fond of the Texas Instruments exploration lessons. The lessons are available for free at education.ti.com and come with a slew of materials and handouts prepared for you. I’ve used the TI Nspire to teach the Law of Sines and the activity went tremendously well.
For Pascal’s Triangle and Binomial Theorem there are equivalent lessons with the TI Nspire and TI 84. The links are included at the end of this. The lessons allow the students to see Pascal’s triangle side by side with the triangle of coefficients which they are generating on the calculator. This could be backed up with having the students physically create the triangles on paper and see that they match up. The lesson then has the students conjecture what they believe the binomial theorem is.
This could be a powerful lesson for engaging learners of various strengths. Kinetic learners will love the physical action of the calculator, visual learners will love seeing the triangles update in real time.
Curriculum- How can this topic be extended to your students future math courses?
Pascal’s triangle has a large relationship to probability and statistics. There are a variety of ways you can tie statistics lessons back to Pascal’s triangle and the binomial theorem. In particular we can examine how we might game a Pachinko machine in order to maximize our winnings.
Pachinko (or Plinko or a variety of other things depending on where you are) is fairly simple in idea.
You have a rectangular grid of pegs in which each row is slightly offset from the row above it. You drop a disc or puck of some kind down and attempt to get it into one of the small bins at the bottom. Sometimes prizes will be attached to certain bins (this is a popular carnival game) and sometimes money will (this is also a popular gambling game.)
The bin in which the puck will land follows a normal distribution based on the starting position. This is unsurprising and can be introduced very easily in a Statistics class when you’re teaching about probability distributions and normal distributions. What is more interesting is that this is very deeply related to Pascal’s Triangle.
Overlaying the triangle on top of the machine yields a triangle which shows the number of possible paths to get to each point. You can use this to make a statistical analysis and actually assign values to the probability of landing in a given spot. Using this knowledge you can game the machine and maximize your odds of getting the giant teddy bear or the fat stack of cash.
This application of Pascal’s triangle and its relationship to elementary combinatorics (which should hearken back to Middle School mathematics in addition to being extendable into Statistics,) is looked at in depth in a paper by Katie Asplund of Iowa State University. I have included this paper below. In addition to this suggestions she also relates a specific activity useful in the exploration where the students look at the various options of n choose k and relate the possibilities back to Pascal’s Triangle. I could not get the link for that specific activity as it requires access to Mathematics Teacher which I was unable to find using the UNT Library Resources.
References and Other Such Things
http://www.math.iastate.edu/thesisarchive/MSM/AsplundCCSS09.pdf
– This paper is written by Katie Asplund. In it she explores a variety of patterns and connections between Pascal’s Triangle and various parts of the high school math curriculum. In particular she is interested in seeing how she can relate the patterns to her own high school pre calculus class. I recommend reading this entirely because it is simply illuminating and has quite a few suggestions you could implement.
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kazimir/history.html
– This website has a quick history of Pascal’s triangle as well as several applications. Using this and Wikipedia I was able to learn about the histories and cultures which led to our modern understanding of the triangle. In particular Omar Khayyam is a very interesting person to talk about if you feel like injecting some history of the Islamic Golden Age and the history of Mathematics after the fall of Rome. Khayyam was a Poet as well as a mathematician, and was one of the first to openly question Euclid’s use of the Parallel Postulate.
– This is the TI Nspire activity on the Binomial Theorem and Pascal’s Triangle. It’s fairly straightforward but, like many of the TI Activities, it has some nice tricks that it uses the calculator to accomplish.
Tic tac toe
Source: http://www.xkcd.com/832_large/
39 Ways to Love Math
From Math with Bad Drawings:
Last week, 6,000 mathematicians met in Baltimore. They crowded in conference rooms, swapped gossip over beers, and wherever free food appeared, they lined up like ants.
On a table in the hallway of the convention center, I stationed paper, markers, and the following invitation:
I got 39 replies, 39 tributes to math’s power—in short, 39 ways to love mathematics.
See the results here: http://mathwithbaddrawings.com/2014/01/22/39-ways-to-love-math/
“Or” / “and”
One of the formulas typically taught in mathematics is
In ordinary English, the probability that either event or
happens is the probability of event
plus the probability of event
minus the probability that the both occur.
For example, when rolling two fair six-sided dice, the probability that at least one three appears is
.
It’s necessary to subtract something off at the end because it’s possible for the first die to be a four and simultaneously the second die to be a four.
This can be a conceptual barrier for students if it’s not directly addressed. In mathematics, the word “or” means “one or the other… or maybe both.” In the previous example, event was “first die is a four” and event
was “second die is a four,” and it’s possible that both events could occur simultaneously.
Of course, this is different than the way we typically use “or” is spoken English. For example, in the final episode of each season of “The Bachelor,” the guy has to choose one woman or the other… and there’s no possibility of him choosing both! When a student says, “Next semester, my morning class will be history or physics,” we don’t think that there’s a possibility that the student will choose both classes… the student will choose one or the other, but not both.
In terms of mathematical logic, the word “or” in ordinary speech really is an “exclusive or.”
As I said, this isn’t a big deal for students to see, but in my opinion it’s best to directly address this subtlety rather than have students confused about which meaning of the word “or” they should be using when doing their homework.
P.S. The good news is that the word “and” means the same thing in the language of probability/logic as its meaning in ordinary speech.





