Inverse functions: Square root (Part 2)

Here is one of the questions that I ask my class of future secondary mathematics teachers to answer.

A student asks, “My father was helping me with my homework last night and he said the book is wrong. He said that \sqrt{4} = 2 and \sqrt{4} = -2, because 2^2 = 4 and (-2)^2 = 4. But the book says \sqrt{4} = 2. He wants to know why we are using a book that has mistakes.”

This is a very similar question to the simplification of \sqrt{x^2}, which was discussed in yesterday’s post. My experience has been that the above misconceptions involves confusion surrounding two very similar-sounding questions.

Question #1: Find all values of x so that x^2 = 9.

Question #2: Find the nonnegative value of x so that x^2 = 9.

The first question can be restated as solving x^2-9 = 0, or finding all roots of a second-order polynomial. Accordingly, there are two answers. (Of course, the answers are 3 and -3, written more succinctly as \pm 3.) The second question asks for the positive answer to Question #1. This positive answer is defined to be \sqrt{9}, or 3.

In other words, it’s important to be sure that you’re answering the right question.

Is it all that important that \sqrt{9} is chosen to be the nonnegative solution to Question #1? Not really. We could have easily chosen the negative answer. The reason we choose the positive answer and not the negative answer can be answered in one word: tradition.

We want f(x) = \sqrt{x} to be a well-defined function that produces only one output value, and there’s no mathematically advantageous reason for choosing the nonnegative answer aside from the important consideration that everyone else does it that way. And though students probably won’t remember this tidbit of wisdom when the time comes, the same logic applies when choosing the range of the inverse trigonometric functions.

Of course, for the present case, it totally makes sense to take the positive, less complicated answer as the output of \sqrt{x}. However, this won’t be as readily apparent when we consider the inverse trigonometric functions.

Leave a comment

1 Comment

  1. Inverse Functions: Index | Mean Green Math

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: