Engaging students: Computing inverse functions

In my capstone class for future secondary math teachers, I ask my students to come up with ideas for engaging their students with different topics in the secondary mathematics curriculum. In other words, the point of the assignment was not to devise a full-blown lesson plan on this topic. Instead, I asked my students to think about three different ways of getting their students interested in the topic in the first place.

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Derek Skipworth. His topic, from Algebra II: computing inverse functions.

green line

B. How can this topic be used in your students’ future courses in mathematics or science?

In essence, an inverse function is supposed to “undo” what the original function did to the original input.  Knowing how to properly create inverse functions gives you the ultimate tool for checking your work, something valuable for any math course.  Another example is Integrals in Calculus.  This is an example of an inverse operation on an existing derivative.  A stronger example of using actual inverse functions is directly applied to Abstract Algebra when inverse matrices are needed to be found.

 

green line

C. How has this topic appeared in high culture?

The idea of inverse functions can be found in many electronics.  My hobby is 2-channel stereo.  Everyone has stereos, but it is viewed as a “higher culture” hobby when you get into the depths that I have reached at this point.  One thing commonly found is Chinese electronics.  How does this correlate to my topic?  Well, the strength of the Chinese is that they are able to offer very similar products comparable to high-end, high-dollar products at a fraction of the costs.  While it is true that they do skimp on some parts, the biggest reason they are able to do this is because of their reverse engineering.  Through reverse engineering, they do not suffer the massive overhead of R&D that the “respectable” companies have.  Lower overhead means lower cost to the consumer.  Because of the idea of working in reverse, “better” products are available to the masses at cheaper prices, thus improving the opportunity for upgrades in 2-channel.

 

green line

E. How can technology be used to effectively engage students with this topic?

A few years ago, there was a game released on Xbox 360 arcade called Braid.  It was a commercial and critical success.  The gameplay was designed around a character who could reverse time.  The trick was that there were certain obstacles in each level that prevented the character from reversing certain actions.  To tie technology into a lesson plan, I would choose a slightly challenging level and have the class direct me through the level.  This would tie into a group activity where the students are required to calculate inverse functions to reverse their steps (like Braid) and eventually solve a “master” problem that would complete the activity.  This activity could be loosely based off a second level that could wrap up the class based off the results that each group produced from the activity.

http://braid-game.com/

 

Formulas for arithmetic and geometric sequences (Part 1)

I’m not particularly a fan of memorizing formulas. Apparently, most college students aren’t fans either, because they often don’t have immediate recall of certain formulas from high school when they’re needed in the collegiate curriculum.

While I’m not a fan of making students memorize formulas, I am a fan of teaching students how to derive formulas. Speaking for myself, if I ever need to use a formula that I know exists but have long since forgotten, the ability to derive the formula allows me to get it again.

Which leads me to today’s post: the derivation of the formulas for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence and of a geometric sequence. This topic is commonly taught in Precalculus but, in my experience, is often forgotten by students years later when needed in later classes.

green lineAn arithmetic sequence is specified by two numbers: the first term and the common difference between terms. For example, if the first term is 16 and the common difference is 3, then the sequence begins as

16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, \dots

If the first term is 29 and the common difference is -4, then the sequence begins as

29, 25, 21, 17, 13, 9, 5, 1, -3, \dots

For those of us old enough to remember, our favorite arithmetic sequences came from Schoolhouse Rock:

Let’s discuss the first arithmetic sequence, whose first seven terms are:

16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, \dots

How do we get the 8th term? That’s easy: we just add 3 to 34 to get 37.

How to we get the 100th term. That’s easy: we just add 3 to the 99th term.

Oops. We don’t know the 99th term. To get the 99th term, we need the 98th term, which in turn requires the 97th term. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

The trouble (so far) is that an arithmetic sequence is recursively defined: to get one term, I add something to the previous term. Mathematically, the arithmetic sequence is defined by

a_n = a_{n-1} + d,

where d is the common difference. This can be very intimidating to students when seeing it for the first time. So, to make this formula less intimidating, I usually read this equation as “Each next term in the sequence is equal to the previous term in the sequence plus the common difference.”

It would be far better to have a closed-form formula, where I could just plug in 100 to get the 100th term, without first figuring out the previous 99 terms.

To this end, we notice the following pattern:

  • Second term: 19 = 16 + 3
  • Third term: 22 = 19 + 3 = 16 + 3 + 3 = 16 + 2 \times 3
  • Fourth term: 25 = 22+ 3 = 16 + (2 \times 3) + 3 = 16 + 3 \times 3
  • Fifth term: 28 = 25+ 3 = 16 + (3 \times 3) + 3 = 16 + 4 \times 3
  • Sixth term: 31 = 28+ 3 = 16+ (4 \times 3) + 3 = 16 + 5 \times 3
  • Seventh term: 34 = 31 + 3 = 16 + (5 \times 3) + 3 = 16 + 6 \times 3

It looks like we have a pattern, so we can guess that:

  • One hundredth term = 16 + (100-1) \times 3 = 313

In general, we have justified the closed-form formula

a_n = a_1 + (n-1)d,

where a_1 is the first term, and d is the common difference.  In words: to get the nth term of an arithmetic sequence, we add d to the first term n-1 times. (This may be formally proven using mathematical induction, though I won’t do so here.)

green lineA closed-form formula for a geometric sequence is similarly obtained. In a geometric sequence, each term is equal to the previous term multiplied by a common ratio. Mathematically, the geometric sequence is recursively defined by

a_n = a_{n-1}r,

where r is the common ratio. For example, if the first term is 3 and the common ratio is 2, then the first few terms of the sequence are

3, 6, 12, 24, 48, dots

By the same logic used above, to get the nth term of an geometric sequence, we multiply r to the first term n-1 times. Thus justifies the formula

a_n = a_1 r^{n-1},

which may be formally proven using mathematical induction.