Issues when conducting political polls (Part 2)

The classic application of confidence intervals is political polling: the science of sampling relatively few people to predict the opinions of a large population. However, in the 2010s, the art of political polling — constructing representative samples from a large population — has become more and more difficult.

The Washington Post recently ran a feature about how the prevalence of cellphones was once feared as a potential cause of bias when conducting a political poll… and what’s happened ever since: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/11/03/pollsters-used-to-worry-that-cellphone-users-would-skew-results-these-days-not-so-much/.

Previous post: Issues when conducting political polls.

How to Call Out Mistakes without Trampling the Mistaken

Math With Bad Drawings had a nice post about strategies teachers can use to address a student who volunteers an incorrect answer. This is a natural dilemma for teachers who want to encourage class participation but who don’t want to deflate students who make mistakes. I recommend this essay highly: http://mathwithbaddrawings.com/2014/11/05/wrong-but-not-stupid-or-how-to-call-out-mistakes-without-trampling-the-mistaken/

One recent strategy that I’ve employed is quoting the trolls from Frozen: https://meangreenmath.com/2014/06/14/a-bit-of-a-fixer-upper/

Optimally Dancing to “Shout”

From the dual categories of “Someone Had To Figure This Out” and “Applied Mathematics At Work,” FiveThirtyEight.com has used a little algebra to answer one of our generation’s most vexing questions:

What’s the proper rate of descent during the “a little bit softer now” portion of the song “Shout?”

Here’s the link to the article: http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/shout-isley-brothers/

And, in case you haven’t been to a wedding reception recently, here’s the song: