I was recently interviewed by my city’s local newspaper about Day and the general fascination with memorizing the digits of
. I was asked by the reporter if the only constraint in our knowledge of the digits of
was the ability of computers to calculate the digits, and I answered in the affirmative.
Here’s the current state-of-the-art for calculating the digits of . Amazingly, this expression was discovered 1995… in other words, very recently.
Because of the term in the denominator, this infinite series converges very quickly.
Proof: If , then we calculate the integral
, defined below:
We now form the linear combination :
Also, from the original definition of the ,
.
Employ the substitution :
Using partial fractions, we find
The expression on the right-hand side can be simplified using standard techniques from Calculus II and is equal to .
So that’s the proof… totally accessible to a student who has mastered concepts in Calculus II. But this begs the question: how in the world did anyone come up with the idea of starting with the integrals $I_k$ to develop an infinite series that leads to ? Let me quote from page 118 of J. Arndt and C. Haenel,
Unleashed (Springer, New York, 2000):
Certainly not by chance, even if luck played some part in the discovery. All three parties [David Bailey, Peter Borwein and Simon Plouffe] are established mathematicians who have been working with the number
for a considerable time… Yet the series was not discovered through mathematical deduction or inference. Instead, the researchers used a tool called Computer Algebra System and a particular procedure called the “PSQL algorithm” to generate their series. They themselves write that they found their formula “through a combination of inspired testing and extensive searching.”
The original paper that announced the discovery of this series can be found at http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/personal/pborwein/PAPERS/P123.pdf.
