A New Derivation of Snell’s Law without Calculus

I’m pleased to say that my latest paper, “A New Derivation of Snell’s Law without Calculus,” has now been published in College Mathematics Journal. The article is now available for online access to anyone who has access to the journal — usually, that means members of the Mathematical Association of America or anyone whose employer (say, a university) has institutional access. I expect that it will be in the printed edition of the journal later this year; however, I’ve not been told yet the issue in which it will appear.

Because of copyright issues, I can’t reproduce my new derivation of Snell’s Law here on the blog, so let me instead summarize the main idea. Snell’s Law (see Wikipedia) dictates the angle at which light is refracted when it passes from one medium (say, air) into another (say, water). If the velocity of light through air is $v_1$ while its velocity in water is $v_2$ , then Snell’s Law says that

$\displaystyle \frac{\sin \theta_1}{v_1} = \displaystyle \frac{\sin \theta_2}{v_2}$

I was asked by a bright student who was learning physics if there was a way to prove Snell’s Law without using calculus. At the time, I was blissfully unaware of Huygens’s Principle (see OpenStax) and I didn’t have a good answer. I had only seen derivations of Snell’s Law using the first-derivative test, which is a standard optimization problem found in most calculus books (again, see Wikipedia) based on Fermat’s Principle that light travels along a path that minimizes time.

Anyway, after a couple of days, I found an elementary proof that does not require proof. I should warn that the word “elementary” can be a loaded word when used by mathematicians. The proof uses only concepts found in Precalculus, especially rotating a certain hyperbola and careful examining the domain of two functions. So while the proof does not use calculus, I can’t say that the proof is particularly easy — especially compared to the classical proof using Huygens’s Principle.

That said, I’m pretty sure that my proof is original, and I’m pretty proud of it.

Engaging students: Adding and subtracting decimals

In my capstone class for future secondary math teachers, I ask my students to come up with ideas for engaging their students with different topics in the secondary mathematics curriculum. In other words, the point of the assignment was not to devise a full-blown lesson plan on this topic. Instead, I asked my students to think about three different ways of getting their students interested in the topic in the first place.

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Sydney Araujo. Her topic, from Pre-Algebra: adding and subtracting decimals.

How could you as a teacher create an activity or project that involves your topic?

I have been riding horses since I was 5 years old, when I was around 12 years old I got into the equine sport called barrel racing. The sport is an equine speed event. Essentially horse and rider go through a clover leaf pattern as fast as possible. Placings are separated by 1000ths of a second. At competitions, there are different divisions, typically 4-5. These divisions are separated by half a second. For example, if the winning time of the barrel race was 15.536 seconds, then the winning times of the different divisions would be as follows, 16.036, 16.536, 17.036, and so on by simply adding half a second. It was always interesting to compare times and to see where I could possibly stand in different divisions based on my time and the winning time. I could see myself creating an activity that had my students be given different scenarios like being given a winning time and determining the winning times of the different divisions, determining which division a certain time would be in, how much faster or slower at time needs to be to place, and so on. This was an activity I did regularly at barrel races for myself and other people when watching.

How has this topic appeared in pop culture (movies, TV, current music, video games, etc.)?

One of the more popular movies I can think of is the movie Hidden Figures. The movie is about a team of African American women mathematicians who work for NASA to help launch an astronaut into orbit. There are several different scenes in the movie where math problems are being solved and this involves the adding and subtracting of decimals. It shows that doing math by hand and math itself is very important in the real world and has helped us make great discoveries and progress. Another movie where adding and subtracting decimals appeared is in the movie called Gifted, where an uncle of an extremely math gifted child suddenly becomes her guardian. She solves several advanced math problems and proofs throughout the movie. The topic also appears in the classic sci-fi TV show Star Trek. It is constantly brought up throughout the series, typically from the character Spock who will make calculations on the spot. As he is a very smart and logical character, he is often the one who must do the required math in the series.

How can this topic be used in your students’ future courses in mathematics or science?

Adding and subtracting decimals is constantly used in both mathematics courses and science courses throughout high school and eventually college. We see adding and subtracting decimals in some trigonometry concepts when solving for theta and using different trig functions. Students will also see this very often in algebra when dealing with real world situations that forces them to have to use decimals. It appears quite a bit when students approach quadratic equations as once, they learn the quadratic formula to solve quadratic equations that don’t have integers, they will run into many decimals and having to add and subtract. Looking even further into the future of student’s math courses, we often must add and subtract decimals when evaluating different limits and integrals. Adding and subtracting decimals also appears in physics courses. Students will often see many decimals in physics when solving problems using force, density, displacement, and so on. You often see more imperfect numbers and situations in physics as it is more often seen in the real world.

Constructing the Null and Alternate Hypotheses

Engaging students: Powers and exponents

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Ashlyn Farley. Her topic, from Pre-Algebra: powers and exponents.

One class activity that will engage students while reviewing and/or teaching Exponent/Power concepts is “Marshmallow and Toothpicks.” This activity can be used for teaching the basic of exponents, as well as exponent laws. The idea is that the toothpicks are different colors, and the different colors represent different bases, thus the same color means it’s the same base. The marshmallows represent the exponent, i.e. the number of times the student needs to multiply the base. By following a worksheet of questions, the students should be able to solve exponent problems physically, visually, and abstractly. This activity, I believe, is best done with partners or groups so that the students can discuss how they think the exponents/exponent laws work. After the activity, the students are also able to eat their marshmallows, which encourages the students to participate and complete their work.

Exponents are used in functions, equations, and expressions throughout math, thus having a deep understanding of exponents and their laws is very important. By fully mastering exponents and exponent laws, the students will be able to more easily grasp more difficult material that uses these concepts. Some specific ideas that use exponents and/or exponent laws in future math courses are: multiplying polynomials, finding the volume and surface area of prisms and cylinders, as well as computing the composition of two functions. Exponents are also used in many other situations than just math, such as in science or even in careers. Some careers that consistently use exponents and/or exponent laws are: Bankers, Computer Programmers, Mechanics, Plumbers, and many more.

How can technology (YouTube, Khan Academy [khanacademy.org], Vi Hart, Geometers Sketchpad, graphing calculators, etc.) be used to effectively engage students with this topic?

An easy way to introduce students who have never seen exponents or exponential growth before is to use a graphing calculator. By plugging in an exponential function into the calculator and viewing the graph and zooming out, students can easily see how quickly numbers start to get The website Legends of Learning focuses on creating educational games for students in kindergarten through 9th grade. One game that goes over exponents, as well as the exponent laws, is Expodyssey. This game has the students solve problems to “fix” a spaceship to get back to Earth. The problems are built upon each other, so it starts by having the student answer what an exponent is, then what multiplying two exponents same base is, and keeps building from there. Each concept has multiple problems to be solved before moving on so that the students can show their mastery of the content. I believe that this game also helps improve cognitive skills by having the students do various activities simultaneously, such as calculating, reading, maneuvering elements and/or filling answers as required.

References:
Blog: Number Dyslexia
Link: https://numberdyslexia.com/top-7-games-for-understanding-math-exponents/

Thoughts on Numerical Integration (Part 23): The normalcdf function on TI calculators

I end this series about numerical integration by returning to the most common (if hidden) application of numerical integration in the secondary mathematics curriculum: finding the area under the normal curve. This is a critically important tool for problems in both probability and statistics; however, the antiderivative of $\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$ cannot be expressed using finitely many elementary functions. Therefore, we must resort to numerical methods instead.

In days of old, of course, students relied on tables in the back of the textbook to find areas under the bell curve, and I suppose that such tables are still being printed. For students with access to modern scientific calculators, of course, there’s no need for tables because this is a built-in function on many calculators. For the line of TI calculators, the command is normalcdf.

Unfortunately, it’s a sad (but not well-known) fact of life that the TI-83 and TI-84 calculators are not terribly accurate at computing these areas. For example:

TI-84: $\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx \approx 0.3413447\underline{399}$

Correct answer, with Mathematica: $0.3413447\underline{467}\dots$

TI-84: $\displaystyle \int_1^2 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx \approx 0.1359051\underline{975}$

Correct answer, with Mathematica: $0.1359051\underline{219}\dots$

TI-84: $\displaystyle \int_2^3 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx \approx 0.021400\underline{0948}$

Correct answer, with Mathematica: $0.021400\underline{2339}\dots$

TI-84: $\displaystyle \int_3^4 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx \approx 0.0013182\underline{812}$

Correct answer, with Mathematica: $0.0013182\underline{267}\dots$

TI-84: $\displaystyle \int_4^5 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx \approx 0.0000313\underline{9892959}$

Correct answer, with Mathematica: $0.0000313\underline{84590261}\dots$

TI-84: $\displaystyle \int_5^6 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx \approx 2.8\underline{61148776} \times 10^{-7}$

Correct answer, with Mathematica: $2.8\underline{56649842}\dots \times 10^{-7}$

I don’t presume to know the proprietary algorithm used to implement normalcdf on TI-83 and TI-84 calculators. My honest if brutal assessment is that it’s probably not worth knowing: in the best case (when the endpoints are close to 0), the calculator provides an answer that is accurate to only 7 significant digits while presenting the illusion of a higher degree of accuracy. I can say that Simpson’s Rule with only $n = 26$ subintervals provides a better approximation to $\displaystyle \int_0^1 \frac{e^{-x^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \, dx$ than the normalcdf function.

For what it’s worth, I also looked at the accuracy of the NORMSDIST function in Microsoft Excel. This is much better, almost always producing answers that are accurate to 11 or 12 significant digits, which is all that can be realistically expected in floating-point double-precision arithmetic (in which numbers are usually stored accurate to 13 significant digits prior to any computations).

Engaging students: Finding prime factorizations

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Bri Del Pozzo. Her topic, from Pre-Algebra: finding prime factorizations.

How could you as a teacher create an activity or project that involves your topic?

An activity that I would create for my students involving Prime Factorization is based on an example that I saw on Pinterest. I would prepare an activity where students would be given a picture of a tree and assigned a two-digit number. I would then have students decorate their tree and at the base of the tree, they would write their assigned number. Then, as the roots expand down, students would be able to write the factors of their number as a factor tree until they are left with only prime factors (based on the image from https://www.hmhco.com/blog/teaching-prime-factorization-of-36). In the example from Pinterest, the teacher focused on finding the greatest common divisors between two numbers and used the factors trees as guidance. For my activity, I would assign some students the same number and emphasize that some numbers (such as 24, 36, 72, etc.) can be factored in multiple ways, so the roots of the trees could look different depending on how the student decides to factor their number.

How can this topic be used in your students’ future courses in mathematics or science?

There are a few ways that Prime Factorization can be used in my students’ future math courses. Prime Factorization is incredibly useful when learning how to simplify fractions. By practicing Prime Factorization, students become more familiar with the factors of large numbers, which becomes helpful when simplifying fractions. In the instance that a fraction is not in its simplest form, students will have an easier time recognizing such and will feel more confident in simplifying the fraction. Additionally, Prime Factorization prepares students for finding Greatest Common Divisors. Knowing how to find Greatest Common Divisors can be useful when solving real-world problems as well as in simplifying fractions. At a higher level of math, Prime Factorization allows students to practice the skills needed to prepare themselves for factoring things more complicated than numbers. For example, the idea of factoring can be applied to factoring a common factor out of an expression, factoring quadratic equations, and factoring polynomials with complex numbers.

How can technology (YouTube, Khan Academy [khanacademy.org], Vi Hart, Geometers Sketchpad, graphing calculators, etc.) be used to effectively engage students with this topic? Note: It’s not enough to say “such-and-such is a great website”; you need to explain in some detail why it’s a great website.

Khanacademy.org would be a fantastic website to engage students in this topic because of the inclusion of multiple representations. This website allows students to work through multiple practice problems where they can find the Prime Factorization of a number. When the student gets the question correct, they can move on to the next question, or they have the option to view a brief explanation on how to arrive at the correct answer. If students get a problem incorrect, they can retry the problem or get help on the question. The “get help” feature also provides students with a brief explanation, with options in video form and picture/written form, of how to solve the problem. Another important feature of this website is the ability for students to write out their thoughts as they work through the problem. Khan Academy allows students the option to use an online “whiteboard” feature that appears directly below the problem. This “whiteboard” feature allows students to write out their work and also offers a walkthrough of how to draw a factor tree.

Resources:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/pre-algebra/pre-algebra-factors-multiples/pre-algebra-prime-factorization-prealg/e/prime_factorization
https://www.hmhco.com/blog/teaching-prime-factorization-of-36

Thoughts on Numerical Integration (Part 22): Comparison to theorems about magnitudes of errors

Numerical integration is a standard topic in first-semester calculus. From time to time, I have received questions from students on various aspects of this topic, including:

Why is numerical integration necessary in the first place?
Where do these formulas come from (especially Simpson’s Rule)?
How can I do all of these formulas quickly?
Is there a reason why the Midpoint Rule is better than the Trapezoid Rule?
Is there a reason why both the Midpoint Rule and the Trapezoid Rule converge quadratically?
Is there a reason why Simpson’s Rule converges like the fourth power of the number of subintervals?

In this series, I hope to answer these questions. While these are standard questions in a introductory college course in numerical analysis, and full and rigorous proofs can be found on Wikipedia and Mathworld, I will approach these questions from the point of view of a bright student who is currently enrolled in calculus and hasn’t yet taken real analysis or numerical analysis.

In this series, we have shown the following approximations of errors when using various numerical approximations for $\int_a^b x^k \, dx$ . We obtained these approximations using only techniques within the reach of a talented high school student who has mastered Precalculus — especially the Binomial Theorem — and elementary techniques of integration.

As we now present, the formulas that we derived are (of course) easily connected to known theorems for the convergence of these techniques. These proofs, however, require some fairly advanced techniques from calculus. So, while the formulas derived in this series of posts only apply to $f(x) = x^k$ (and, by an easy extension, any polynomial), the formulas that we do obtain easily foreshadow the actual formulas found on Wikipedia or Mathworld or calculus textbooks, thus (hopefully) taking some of the mystery out of these formulas.

Left and right endpoints: Our formula was

$E \approx \displaystyle \frac{k}{2} x_*^{k-1} (b-a)h$ ,

where $x_*$ is some number between $a$ and $b$ . By comparison, the actual formula for the error is

$E = \displaystyle \frac{f'(x_*) (b-a)^2}{2n} = \frac{f'(x_*)}{2} (b-a)h$ .

This reduces to the formula that we derived since $f'(x) = kx^{k-1}$ .

Midpoint Rule: Our formula was

$E \approx \displaystyle \frac{k(k-1)}{24} x_*^{k-1} (b-a)h$ ,

where $x_*$ is some number between $a$ and $b$ . By comparison, the actual formula for the error is

E = \displaystyle \frac{f''(x_*) (b-a)^3}{24n^2} = \frac{f''(x_*)}{24} (b-a)h^2

This reduces to the formula that we derived since $f''(x) = k(k-1)x^{k-2}$ .

Trapezoid Rule: Our formula was

$E \approx \displaystyle \frac{k(k-1)}{12} x_*^{k-1} (b-a)h$ ,

where $x_*$ is some number between $a$ and $b$ . By comparison, the actual formula for the error is

$E = \displaystyle \frac{f''(x_*) (b-a)^3}{12n^2} = \frac{f''(x_*)}{12} (b-a)h^2$ .

This reduces to the formula that we derived since $f''(x) = k(k-1)x^{k-2}$ .

This reduces to the formula that we derived since $f''(x) = k(k-1)x^{k-2}$ .

Simpson’s Rule: Our formula was

$E \approx \displaystyle \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{180} x_*^{k-4} (b-a)h^4$ ,

where $x_*$ is some number between $a$ and $b$ . By comparison, the actual formula for the error is

$E = \displaystyle \frac{f^{(4)}(x_*)}{180} (b-a)h^4$ .

This reduces to the formula that we derived since $f^{(4)}(x) = k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)x^{k-4}$ .

Engaging students: Solving two-step algebra problems

I plan to share some of the best of these ideas on this blog (after asking my students’ permission, of course).

This student submission comes from my former student Chi Lin. Her topic, from Pre-Algebra: solving two-step algebra problems.

How could you as a teacher create an activity or project that involves your topic?

There is an interesting activity that I found online. It is called mini task cards. However, I want to rename this activity as “Find your partners” as an engage activity in this topic. I am going to create some two-step equations on the cards and give those cards randomly to the students at the beginning of the class. Each student has one mini card. The students will have 5 minutes to solve the equations and they will find the partners who have the same answers as them (there is 2-3 person in each group). The person who has the same answer with them will be the partner that they are working together with in the class. I will set up the answer as their group name (for example, if the answer is 1, then it means the group name is “Group One”). Here is an example that how the card will look like.

Reference:

12 Activities that Make Practicing Two-Step Equations Pop

How can this topic be used in your students’ future courses in mathematics or science?

Solving two-step equations is the foundation of solving multi-step equations. Solving two-step equations looks easy but it can become very hard. This topic can be applied in lots of areas such as high-level math classes, computer science, chemistry, physics, engineer, and so on. Most definitely, the students will see lots of problems about solving multi-step equations in different high-level mathematics courses in college, such as pre-calculus, calculus 1-3, differential equations, and so on. Also, the students will use the knowledge when they write the code in computer science class. For example, when they write down the code of two-step or multi-step algebra problems, they need to know which step goes first. If they do the step wrong, then the computer program will compute the wrong result. Moreover, the students will use solving two-step equations in chemistry class. For example, the students will apply this knowledge, when they write down the chemical equations and try to balance the equations.

How does this topic extend what your students should have learned in previous courses?
First, students should know what linear equations are and how to write down the linear equations. Second, students should know how to solve one-step algebra problems, such as $x+8=16$ or $x/8=16$ . Students should have learned that when they solve for the one-step equations (addition and subtract), whatever they do to one side of the equation, they need to make sure they add the same thing to the other side. For example, when they solve the equation $x+8=16$ , they can subtract 8 for both sides, which is $x+8-8=16-8$ . Therefore, x=8. Also, student should know that when they solve for the one-step equations (multiplication and division), they need to multiply both side by the reciprocal of the coefficient of the variable. For example, when they solve the equation $x/8=16$ , they need to multiply the reciprocal of $1/8$ for both sides, which is $x/8*8=16*8$ . Therefore, $x=128$ . Thus, when they learn to solve two-step equations, they need to combine these rules.

References:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra-home/alg-basic-eq-ineq/alg-one-step-mult-div-equations/a/one-step-equation-review

Solving Two-Step Equations

Thoughts on Numerical Integration (Part 21): Simpson’s rule and global rate of convergence

Numerical integration is a standard topic in first-semester calculus. From time to time, I have received questions from students on various aspects of this topic, including:

Why is numerical integration necessary in the first place?
Where do these formulas come from (especially Simpson’s Rule)?
How can I do all of these formulas quickly?
Is there a reason why the Midpoint Rule is better than the Trapezoid Rule?
Is there a reason why both the Midpoint Rule and the Trapezoid Rule converge quadratically?
Is there a reason why Simpson’s Rule converges like the fourth power of the number of subintervals?

In this previous post in this series, we showed that the Simpson’s Rule approximation of $\displaystyle \int_{x_i}^{x_i+2h} x^k \, dx$ has an error of

$-\displaystyle \frac{k(k-1)(k-2)(k-3)}{90} x_i^{k-4} h^5 + O(h^6)$ .